TechCrunch, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST
|
Business Insider, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST HSBC has promoted two bankers internally to cohead its equity capital markets operation in the US and Canada. Brendan Spinks and Alfred Traboulsi were each named cohead of ECM in North America for the London-based bank this week, a company spokesman confirmed. Both men were advanced from within the firm's ECM department. Spinks has been with the bank since 2002, according to his LinkedIn page, while Traboulsi joined HSBC from Goldman Sachs' equity derivatives team in 2014. HSBC ranked 11 globally in the first half for investment banking fees, according to Thomson Reuters, behind Wells Fargo and ahead of UBS. It generated around $1 billion in fees globally, with $276 million in fees from the Americas. Samir Assaf, CEO of global banking and markets at HSBC, told Financial Times last year that the bank was targeting market share gains in the advisory and equity business outside of Asia, its traditional area of strength. “We have progressed in Europe and emerging markets in the last three years," he told the FT. "We think that we still have much more to go." Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: Shiller says bitcoin is the best example of a bubble in the market today |
CoinDesk, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST With the help of Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Apple, the W3C is deploying a browser API that could extend cryptocurrency's payments potential. |
Business Insider, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST Justin White started his career "at a consulting firm you've never heard of." But after joining the asset-management giant T. Rowe Price, and showing a strong track record as a media and tech analyst, he was tapped last April to run its New America Growth Fund. Like many peers who made big bets on large technology companies, White is crushing it in 2017. His fund, with $4 billion in assets under management, gained 25% this year through Thursday. That's stronger than the Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Average it's compared to, and the broader Russell 1000 index he describes as an "imperfect" benchmark. Stock pickers like White are seeing a turnaround in their fortunes this year. Since the recession, more money has gone to passive strategies and products like exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that are designed to mimic the returns of an existing index. "The real test for active management is going to be the next bear market," White told Business Insider. "We should see all the stocks that went up for reasons that didn't make sense get obliterated as people sell. And active managers — if they're as good as they're supposed to be — should be able to sidestep that more elegantly than ETFs or passive strategies can." 'Frustrating' financialsTo ride out the inevitable downturn, one of White's preferred sectors is financials. But that's been a "frustrating" bet this year, he said. It's not what many fund managers believed just after the 2016 election, when they expected higher interest rates and deregulation to help banks. "The number one reason why financials have not done what people hoped they would do is because the 10-year Treasury yield has just remained anchored so low," White said. This has limited the earnings banks make from their net interest margins, or the gap between the interest rates at which they lend and borrow, relative to their assets. "I'm overweight financials, but I wouldn't call it a very high-conviction positioning right now," White said. "I'm hopeful that we'll get tax reform. If we get tax reform, that would be a significant catalyst for the group. But the last nine months do make you a bit wary of the government can accomplish." To its benefit, the current administration was handed an economy in expansion. But the 10-year yield, which peaked this year in March near 2.57%, and the flattening yield curve "might be telling us that there's trouble around the corner," White said.
|
Business Insider, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST LONDON – Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson promised a "glorious" Brexit in a 4,000 word Daily Telegraph article, days ahead of a key speech from Prime Minister Theresa May. Johnson said the UK will not pay to access the single market and reiterated the Vote Leave campaign promise to spend £350 million extra a week on the National Health Service. “Once we have settled our accounts, we will take back control of roughly £350 million per week," said Johnson. "It would be a fine thing as many of us have pointed out if a lot of that money went on the NHS, provided we use that cash injection to modernise and make the most of new technology." He also said the UK should borrow money to spend on boosting infrastructure in London and that doubters will see the UK "succeed mightily" in Brexit. "They think that we will simply despair of finding the way out of the EU and sit down on the floor and cry – like some toddler lost in the maze at Hampton Court. Well, in so far as they doubt our resolve, I believe they are wrong; and I am here to tell you that this country will succeed in our new national enterprise, and will succeed mightily," wrote Johnson. The Telegraph summarised Johnson's article as a 10-point-plan for a "successful Brexit," with one of the points being "Brexit will be a success." Other policy proposals include curbing non-UK citizens' property ownership and a push to accelerate work on gene therapy. The article has been seen as a challenge to Theresa May, who is expected to lay out her plans for a "status quo" transitional deal in a speech to to the world's media next week. The prime minister will use a keynote speech in Florence, Italy, next Friday to suggest the sort of transitional period that Chancellor Philip Hammond has described a "status quo" arrangement, the Financial Times reports. The term "status quo" describes a scenario where Britain would continue with many aspects of EU membership during a period lasting up to three years commencing after Brexit day in March 2019. This could include staying both in the single market and customs union until a long-term arrangement post-Brexit is ready to be implemented. Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: THE BOTTOM LINE: A lot of talk of a bitcoin bubble and a few good reasons to believe tech isn't one |
Business Insider, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST LONDON — Startup bank Monzo is doing away with one of its most popular features — unlimited free ATM withdrawals overseas. The company, which offers a prepaid money card and is rolling out current accounts, is asking its customers to choose the best new charging option for ATM fees abroad, saying its existing policy has become simply too costly to continue. Withdrawals from international holes-in-the-wall cost Monzo between 1-2% of each transaction. Costs have more than doubled in the last year from £6 to £16 per user, the company says. "This seems to be a result of a combination of factors, including people using their Monzo cards more frequently, increased awareness of the free cash withdrawals we’ve offered, and people signing up specifically to use the Monzo card abroad," Tristan Thomas, Monzo's head of marketing and community, wrote in a blog post this week. Anecdotally, this rings true. I have recommended Monzo to friends and family to use when traveling abroad thanks to its free ATM withdrawals and good rates. (I also included it in a roundup last year of fintech products that can help you save money when traveling.) 13% of users account for 85% of the ATM fee costs, Monzo says, suggesting that a small core of users have been using Monzo extensively abroad. "We want to build a sustainable, viable business that is around for many years to come," Tristan says. "At the moment, the rising costs of foreign ATM withdrawals makes that difficult." Spending on cards while abroad, online sales in foreign currencies, and UK ATM withdrawals will all still remain free, Monzo says. But it is asking users to what to do about the overseas ATM withdrawals, offering three options:
Monzo is inviting feedback from its customer base on its website here. Fintech's fee problem
All are grappling with a core problem for many fintech startups — can they convert all their users into paying customers? Businesses like Monzo and Revolut have caught the attention of investors and the press thanks to the rapid growth of their customer bases. Revolut didn't exist two years ago but already has over half a million users. Many people have undoubtedly signed up for startups like these because of the low-cost or free services that they offer. Usually, the costs of these services are simply absorbed by the business. These startups argue that, while giving things like ATM withdrawals costs them money, the cost of user acquisition is still lower than what traditional banks pay. If they can make money from a user through another service, overdrafts say, once they've hooked them with free withdrawals, the up front investment and economics make sense. However, both Revolut and Monzo are loss making and the claim that they can ultimately make enough money from users to cover costs remains just a theory. Early indications suggest it could be easier said than done. Travelex launched a card to rival Revolut last year, the SuperCard, which offered free spending abroad but a 2.99% fee on any ATM withdrawals. Clearly, the hope was that customers would get the card but end up doing an ATM withdrawal here and there, giving Travelex a bit of revenue. Things have not gone to plan. Travelex shut down the SuperCard scheme in May, citing "much higher than anticipated" costs. It seems that it is easier to simply charge the customer the foreign exchange fees up front so that everyone's on the same page. There are other examples of plans going awry. Monese, a banking app for migrants, found that when people reached their monthly free activity cap, rather than pay for services people just stopped using the app. It has since pivoted to a paid-for model, to ensure customers are willing to pay from the start. Across fintech, we may well see the growing creep of up-front charges for services as many startups clock that giving away freebies is not quite the same as winning loyal customers. Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: Shiller says bitcoin is the best example of a bubble in the market today |
Business Insider, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST LONDON – Ratings agency Moody's warned that bundles of pubs' debt will suffer over the next 12-18 months, as earnings are hit by a decline in demand for beer, a weak pound and rises in the national living wage and inflation. "Debt serviceability and leverage of rated transactions show early warning signals," Moody's said, referring to the difficulty pubs are having in using cash-flow to service their debt. The credit rating firm said that "debt multiples have largely shown a downward trajectory in recent years. However, there are signals that the decline is slowing and may potentially start rising." Pubs have been hit by a general consumer spending slowdown, as well as changing tastes and fashions. "Pub operators' earnings are being curtailed by changes in consumer demand away from beer consumption as well as macroeconomic factors," said Thomas Rahman, an analyst at Moody's, said in the note. The changing landscape In 2011, pubs across the UK were closing at a rate of 29 per week, and the number of pubs in the UK fell by almost 10,000 between 1997 and 2015. Between 2000 and 2016, total beer sales in the UK also fell 23.5%, from 140.5 million barrels to 107.5 million barrels. This, said Moody's, can be explained by a combination of the availability of cheap alcohol at supermarkets, lower levels of disposable income post-financial crisis, growing health concerns and the 2007 ban on smoking indoors. However, pubs' turnover has remained generally stable, as many have turned to selling food and rebranded to become gastro-pubs and incorporate restaurants, and Moody's estimates food sales now represent about half of total pub sales. The work needed to convert pubs, however, requires substantial upfront costs, which has limited free cash flow growth. Brexit and wider economic changes The rise of the national living wage — which went up to £7.50 per hour in April 2017 — has also negatively impacted profits: Moody's estimates that Spirit's employments costs will rise by about £8 million, while M&B will spend an additional £28 million on wages. The planned further increase to £9 by April 2020 is also predicted to cause problems. Aside from the impact it has already had on inflation and a weaker pound, Brexit poses a more direct risk to the future of pubs: a significant proportion of the food and drink sold at pubs is imported, and Moody's expects costs to rise by 5% year-on-year until 2019. "Annual wholesale food inflation had increased to 6% in March 2017... and inflationary costs pressures are anticipated to continue through the second half of the year and into next year at a similar level," M&B reported in its H1 2017 results. To help offset rising costs, pub wholesalers have turned to selling land adjacent to pubs, as well as leasing some of their properties to other businesses or selling outright. Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: Shiller says bitcoin is the best example of a bubble in the market today |
TechCrunch, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST
|
Bitcoin Magazine, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST Unless you’ve been in a crypto-free cave for the past week, you might have noticed the crypto-wide market drop. Last week, rumors of China’s crackdown on BTC to fiat transactions began to spread across the crypto-world. On Monday, mainstream news sources such as The Guardian, Forbes, Wall Street Journal, and Bloomberg further supported or confirmed these rumors by releasing articles with the news of a Chinese crackdown on exchanges. According to Chinese state newspaper Securities Times, “All trading exchanges must by midnight of 15 September publish a notice to make clear when they will stop all cryptocurrency trading and announce a stop to new user registrations." Within a day and a half, BTC-USD saw a 15% markdown as the price dropped from $4400 to $3750. After all was said and done, BTC-USD managed to squeeze out one last push before bottoming out around $3000. The bottom was immediately greeted by a strong rally that propelled the price upward by $900. The price shot down, the price shot up — where does this leave us now?
Since the beginning of this bull run from $1800, we have established very clear, very strong support and resistance levels along the Fibonacci Retracement set shown above. At the time of this article, BTC-USD is testing the macro 38% retracement line where strong, historic support will prove quite tough to penetrate. With such a large growth in such a short period of time, BTC-USD managed to climb about 150% in market value within the span of about a month. One idea I’ve been considering during the climbs to toward the ATH is the the Wyckoff trading range schematic shown below:
Historically, as markets progress through time, they go through phases of accumulation (a phase where investors and traders begin to buy and accumulate assets) and distribution (a phase where traders and investors begin to sell off their accumulated assets). In order words, the market goes up and a bull rally begins, the market begins to top out, and then a bearish rally will bring the prices back down to a comfortable level. It’s a sort of give-and-take in the market as traders begin to place their bets on the future market direction. In our current case, over the last couple months bitcoin has formed a very similar pattern to Distribution Schematic #1 shown above. The above schematic represents one of the possible ways a market can rise, find its top, and distribute assets to market. Comparing the schematic above to the the current BTC-USD market pattern, we can see a lot of striking similarities: The nomenclature for this schematic is found here and is vital to understanding the upcoming discussion. While a bearish continuation has yet to be confirmed, the most recent price hike this morning seems to fit the last test of the Wyckoff schematic LPSY (Last Point of Supply). The last point of supply is essentially a false rally where those who didn’t have an opportunity to sell on the previous LPSY now have an opportunity and will begin to sell into the more bullish traders who fall victim to a false breakout. The SOW (sign of weakness) is marked by high sell volume that leads into an AR (automatic rally) where the sell pressure lets up and bullish traders assume a bottom has been hit. The automatic rally is marked by a bullish climb with great ease before finding its top near the previous lines of support shown above in green. The LPSY is most notably described as a series of peaks and valleys on a fairly narrow spread as the bulls and bears exchange positions. During this LPSY, we will expect to see diminishing volume as the market pushes to new highs and becomes more and more difficult. A closer view of the current trend reveals we have begun the process of weakening rallies with the LPSY:
Throughout the length of this small trend, we can see diminishing volume on each consecutive push toward new highs. If we manage to continue downward, expect turbulence at the $3000 levels and a possible secondary bounce as the $3000 level offers very strong, historic support. It should be noted however, even though this current trend has a strong resemblance to the Wyckoff schematic, it is always important to confirm the trend before trading it. As with any market, it is entirely possible that this Wyckoff distribution pattern will fail and bitcoin will manage to continue onward and upward to new highs. A market reversal should definitely not be ruled out as the current market trend is showing a strong sign of uncertainty between the bulls and bears. Whether the market breaks upward or downward, always confirm the move with strong volume to support a strong move in the direction the trend. Volatility is to be expected, but we approach the market with a level head and objectivity, seeing the proper positional entries and exits will much easier to spot. Summary:
Trading and investing in digital assets like bitcoin, bitcoin cash and ether is highly speculative and comes with many risks. This analysis is for informational purposes and should not be considered investment advice. Statements and financial information on Bitcoin Magazine and BTC Media related sites do not necessarily reflect the opinion of BTC Media and should not be construed as an endorsement or recommendation to buy, sell or hold. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: How Rumblings From China Play Into Wyckoff Distributions appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine. |
CoinDesk, 1/1/0001 12:00 AM PST A new exchange is courting users of the now-defunct BTC-e exchange, but it bears a striking resemblance to its illicit predecessor. |